Hi Guys: Thanks for the info.
What process do the VBS scripts run under?
Is it the WindowEyes Assembly or something else?
  A process has it's own space and variables and all that jazz so my external 
script won't have to worry about stepping on anything running under the 
WindowEyes Process.
  I am not so sure about the various VBS apps running concurrently under a 
single process but that is not relevant to my external script at hand anyway.
  I have found that WE provides a STA model and my script is running in STA 
mode by default.
  So I am in compliance there.
  Marshalling and syncronization are automatically done for com between the 
managed process and the OutOfProcess operations.
  The only communications between my Process, threads, and any of the Global 
Scripts running under the WE Process? would have to be manually provided by the 
WE Engine and I dont think it does that.
  So, if my understanding is correct I am good to go with either a Global or a 
Associated script without having to worry about Cross Process or threading 
except within my own Process environment.
  Does this sound right guys?
  Rick USA

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Chip Orange 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:34 PM
  Subject: RE: WE And Global Scripts And Thread Safety


  Hi Rick,

  As Ron mentioned, there is no difference between running a script globally or 
not.  It's only about when it's started and nothing else.    An 
application-specific app gets started when the program starts; global apps when 
WE starts.

  Everybody gets their own thread at a minimum, and if external, their own 
process.

  Chip




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    From: RicksPlace [mailto:[email protected]] 
    Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 12:21 PM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: WE And Global Scripts And Thread Safety


    Hi BT: Ya, back in the day I wrote a sort of Space Invaders for the first 
version of the IBM PC using Assembler.
    Back then we used registers and offsets as well as the basic instruction 
set available with the IBM assembler for it's PC.
    I have never mucked with machine code after having to do it a little in 
school back in the 1960s if I remember.
    As I read up on processes, threads and apartments I am finding out more 
about the complexity of the Operating System and how it spins off new processes 
and the threads associated with a process, marshalling for cross-threading and 
cross-process operations and how these states can be set within an applications 
program in vb.net or C#.
    Prior to this I had only used some of the high-level tools to run threads 
in the background.
      Now I am doing a little reading about how sta and mta and the various 
Threading Class properties and methods impact the operations of a vb.net or 
CSharp program.
      It does, however, seem that running a script globally is a thing which 
might require a solid understanding of the above technicals to avoid some nasty 
unintended consiquences for end users.
      Anyway, I'll continue reading up on this subject, try some experiments  
and see how it relates to a COM server as it were to try and have a solid 
working understanding of these critical technicals.
      Thanks for the help guys:
      Rick USA
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: BT 
      To: [email protected] 
      Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:35 AM
      Subject: Re: WE And Global Scripts And Thread Safety



      Hi Rick,

          Ron explained it in more detail. The process ID still points to the 
same window and unless you are monitoring different events, you will get the 
same result in both cases. Process ID are kind of like window handles but not 
the same entirely.

          Ron did a pretty good job in describing it. I use to use all of this 
when I wrote a DOS screen reader program, back in the easy days of windows 
programming. It worked really great and the Process ID was captured to keep 
stacks and such straight forward for calling such things as, Is my screen 
reader running?...so it does not get loaded twice into memory.

          Windows has just messed up the ease at getting information from the 
keyboard and screen mainly because of the layers of children involved...
          I wrote the entire screen reader program using the MASM utility and 
all done in machine code...
      Screen Reader Demo:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2LyRC99Qx0
      Part 2 Of Screen Reader Demo:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUy8c1jTt9k

        Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:18 AM
        Subject: Re: WE And Global Scripts And Thread Safety


        Hi Bruce, I dont understand could you flesh out the following?
        You wrote:
            I think each instance is its own but I may be wrong. 
        When you talk about instance do you mean thread, script, sub or method 
within a script etc...
        And do you mean instance in the technical (OOP) sense or as a general 
term?
        The only conflict is the
        process ID which I am sure you are concerned with. 
        OK, I thought each script passed it's ProcessID for the APP it was 
scripting but what about a Global Script?
        Are you saying all global scripts run under the same process?
        If so does each have it's own thread and, in that case, would local 
variables not located inside a sub be Cross-Threaded and thus available and 
modifiable by all other scripts running at the same time?
        Try and see if your instance is
        different, unless you are looking at the same events then that would 
create a problem.
        I dont understand the above.
        How can I look at my instance? Do you mean thread? and, if so, how do I 
do that or what tool would be good to use?
        Your question about events should be handled, I think, by filtering 
messages somehow as is done in Chip's class if I remember so I dont think you 
mean script.
            Also Rick, the Victory Associates software you were going to 
attempt to work
        with had a virus inside of it. It is a good thing you did not work with 
it.
        Phew!
        It wouldn't have mattered unless the virus was in the Corporation's 
software since I dont think RDP would have transmitted the virus unless I 
downloade software from his machine.
        In either case I felt bad I couldn't have helped him.
        Rick USA
          ----- Original Message ----- 
          From: BT 
          To: [email protected] 
          Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:12 AM
          Subject: Re: WE And Global Scripts And Thread Safety


          Hi Rick,

              I think each instance is its own but I may be wrong. The only 
conflict is the process ID which I am sure you are concerned with. Try and see 
if your instance is different, unless you are looking at the same events then 
that would create a problem.

              Also Rick, the Victory Associates software you were going to 
attempt to work with had a virus inside of it. It is a good thing you did not 
work with it.

                  Bruce

            Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:31 AM
            Subject: WE And Global Scripts And Thread Safety


            Hi Scriptors:
            Does a Global Script run in it's own process with independent 
threads?
            We pass the ProcessID to WE  and it can be used for filtering 
Windows and Messages
            so I am wondering about whether shared (static) variable or data 
objects in one Global
            script could step on shared (static) objects of the same name and 
signature in another
            script or Client Application if they are not Windows or Messages.
            In other  words, are Global Scripts thread safe considering shared 
(static) variables
            and Data items?
            I hope this question makes sense.
            I have an external script that worked well when associated with a 
particular application but had some problems when I made it a Global Script.
            I have since pulled out code that used shared items and have made 
everything instance objects but haven't had time to test it yet.
            My guess was that I was stepping on my own shared objects since I 
used the same objects in another application I was looking at and even in other 
global test scripts I still had running since they were more or less useful.
            I just would like to know if this is a possibility since resolving 
it is my responsibility if that is the case, and yours too as scriptors.
            If each script runs in it's own process independent of each other 
and independent of the targeted application this might not be a consideration 
but I dont think that is how it works.
            WE needs communication among all facets of a session so I am 
guessing this conceptual model needs consideration but would like to know the 
real deal so I am not guessing.
            Rick USA

Reply via email to