Pity you can't get the DECTalk if you're buying Window-Eyes for the first time.
At 18:05 19/11/2014, you wrote:
Yep the dectalk is the best here. I use tone I
for everything this is perfect Paul. The
response time is wonderful, and the old dectalk
is still the clearest out there.
Hth
From: LBX [mailto:lab...@fltg.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 5:01 AM
To: gw-scripting@gwmicro.com
Subject: Re: WE Voices For Programming
Hi Rick,
Synthesizer Dectalk
I use Screen Tone L, Keyboard Tone M and Mouse Tone Q
With a rate of 62 for screen and mouse, with keyboard set at 72
With screen and mouse pitch at 3 and keyboard at 4
But everything is dependent on your hearing ability.
Bruce
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 4:58 AM
Subject: WE Voices For Programming
Hi: I am using one of the default synths and it
has a little lag and doesnt read capitals with
a noticible rise in pitch for cap letters whin
using read character (right arrow) and especially when selecting characters.
It is just clunky compared to what I was use to
using Eloquence on my old xp machine.
First, which voices have you found read and type
clearly at high speeds, I type and read letters
and numbers as well as words and paragraphs
pretty fast since I have touch typed for about 40 or 50 years now.
What synths have you found the most responsive
while programming and have you downloaded any
synths or voices from GW I read the process
and it sounds confusing to a simple minded bloke like me.
I am leaning twoard Eloquence but without trying
other synths, not just hearing them but use them
tpityping and reading characters I dont have a
clue how they will respond to my high-speed need for clarity.
Any suggestions on how to try them out or on how to pick one for programming?
Rick USA
<http://www.avast.com/>
Image removed by sender.
This email is free from viruses and malware
because <http://www.avast.com/>avast! Antivirus protection is active.
