The idea what Gabriel is explaining would be awesome. I'm happy with
everything so far what GWT-EXT came with, except this duplicate thing with
extjs resources.

Maybe Sjivan feels like being merciful today and can think about it... ;-)

I would really appreciate if the design would change heading towards
Gabriel's idea.

Thanks,
Dariusz





On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Gabriel Ernesto Gutierrez Añez <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Also, what it is in the public gets duplicated. it is added again in
> the webcontent after compile. ( so there is a megabyte minimun )
>
> maybe, it would be nice to have like an spetial tag for looking the
> resource that could act as relative and abosolute as well. maybe a tag
> like
>
> <resource-folder path="">
>
> and when you type <stylesheet src=""/> you will use relative path
> begining from the resource folder path that eventually it will
> translated to
>
> <resource-folder-path><stylesheet-src>
>
> But i think if you have it inside your app in a diferent directory as
> you said, you'll have to upload it everytime it will be the same.
>
> Regards,
>
> On 4/2/09, Dariusz Borowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hey, that's the point! The idea of putting the extjs sources in public
> > folder is a little bit heavy and not very useful. 2 days ago, I posted a
> > question exactly about the same subject.
> >
> > Isn't it possible to have one directory in your webapp/application where
> you
> > point your modules to it? I was thinking not to point to a different
> domain,
> > rather than to directory inside your application.
> >
> > D.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Gabriel Gutierrez
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Well this is just a tip not a question.
> >>
> >> Today I was doing an application and i realice that when you use GWT-
> >> Ext the .war sizes more than a megabit because of the ext-js files and
> >> the libraries.
> >>
> >> So the first and dummy thing, was to move all libraries to the common
> >> server lib folder. (reduces a lot). If you do only this, the
> >> application still will size more than a mega.
> >>
> >> So if your production or wharever server is in another country and you
> >> need to go under internet or a VPN you still need to pass more than a
> >> mega, and without a good brandwith it could take some time, so this
> >> can help a bit, not much but is something.
> >>
> >> For the ext-js files i came with this:
> >>
> >> 1.- I build another web project that only have js-ext files inside the
> >> webcontent folder, lets called it "resources"
> >>
> >> resources.war
> >> + WEB-INF
> >>    + web.xml
> >> + METAINF
> >> + js (this is the folder where all ext-js files are)
> >>
> >> then create the war and uploaded into the web server, this war will
> >> size about 600 Kb
> >>
> >> Remove any welcome file, cuz this will be for .js, .css and images, so
> >> there shouldn't be any .html or .jsp files here, if you dont do this
> >> nothing will happen is just to reduce a bit the size of this file.
> >>
> >> Then in the app project, locate the module.gwt.xml file and add the
> >> full path of the ext-js resources, something like
> >>
> >> <module>
> >>        <stylesheet src="http://IP.AD.DR.ESS<:PORT>/resources/js/ext/
> >> resources/css/ext-all.css" />
> >>        <script src="http://IP.AD.DR.ESS
> >> <:PORT>/resources/js/ext/adapter/ext/
> >> ext-base.js" />
> >>        <script
> src="http:/IP.AD.DR.ESS<:PORT>/resources/js/ext/ext-all.js"
> >> /
> >> >
> >>       /* ... other stuff here ....  */
> >> </module>
> >>
> >> And finally test your app,
> >>
> >> Here are some good point that i see by doing this.
> >>
> >> + You don't need to add ext-js files in every application you do.
> >> + Application's size gets reduced in a significant way (4.7 megas from
> >> gwt-servlet, gwt-user and gwt-ext libs, and about 600 Kb from ext-js
> >> file)
> >> + If you want to change ext-js version, just replace the resources.war
> >> project, there is no need to change/restart the rest of the
> >> applications (imaging havin 5 o more applications to update)
> >>
> >> Disadvantages so far...
> >>
> >> + An outside project can use your server as a resource server (but
> >> this will happen too in the normal way).
> >>
> >> If you have any comment ( and i know this is a bit dummy, but i wanted
> >> to post it) or disagrees, please do it.
> >>
> >> I tested in a local and remote servers and it worked so far.
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> _____________________
> Ing. Gabriel Gutiérrez
> Celular: +52 1 81 1071 7213
> Oficina: +52    81 8153 2415
> Monterrey, México
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"GWT-Ext Developer Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-ext?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to