about jsp/gwt i'm totally ignorant....i don't know sorry.... 2009/7/21 SunilBansal <[email protected]>
> > ok, but i checked in SmartGWT demo there seems to be no memory > leakage. But what you think about GWT embed in JSP. > > On Jul 21, 2:45 pm, Patrizio De Michele <[email protected]> wrote: > > about leakages....after gwt-ext experience i don't know if smartgwt it's > the > > right choice.. > > if you make the porting let me know how much is difficult and if REALLY > has > > no leakages... > > > > 2009/7/21 SunilBansal <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > Pat, is it working in another versions like ie6, ie7 etc or firefox? > > > > > are you talking about using this reload method > > > > > private native void reload() /*-{ > > > $wnd.location.reload(); > > > }-*/ > > > > > On Jul 20, 6:31 pm, Patrizio De Michele <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > emh....if i do a F5 (aka refresh) it doesn't free memory at all!! > > > > Only increases memory occupation with new elements.... > > > > :( > > > > strange isn't it? > > > > > > 2009/7/20 Adam Fredericks <[email protected]> > > > > > > > I have just come to accept these memory leaks, and in so doing I > just > > > > > ensure that every design I do using GWT-Ext reuses as many elements > as > > > > > possible or is split between multiple pages so that the browser > > > refreshes, > > > > > which is the only real way to retrieve memory in IE6+. You’ll spend > the > > > same > > > > > amount of time trying to plug leaks as you would approaching any > design > > > from > > > > > that perspective – in my opinion. And if you’re clever with the > design, > > > the > > > > > end result ends up providing a much better user experience. > > > > > > > Adam > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > *On > > > > > Behalf Of *Patrizio De Michele > > > > > *Sent:* Monday, July 20, 2009 7:09 AM > > > > > *To:* [email protected] > > > > > *Subject:* Re: GWT EXT Memory Leakage > > > > > > > looking at sources you(we) don't need to deAttach listeners is done > > > > > automatically... > > > > > but just to be sure i'm overriding onDestroy method and clearing as > > > much as > > > > > i can. > > > > > for example i have a window that isn't destroyed automatically... > > > > > bye Pat > > > > > > > 2009/7/20 Patrizio De Michele <[email protected]> > > > > > > > ok we got the same problem.....NOTHING is released :( > > > > > memory is always growing.....:( > > > > > it's a very huge problem for me.... > > > > > i'll start with removing listeners... > > > > > > > 2009/7/20 Patrizio De Michele <[email protected]> > > > > > > > try to remove all listeners....and also to check if it is called > > > > > the onDestroy event if it is called it should be enough to grant > > > > > that garbage will be called. > > > > > I believe that simply settings null isn't enough maybe a direct > > > > > call to destroy method is better, probably will release a lot of > > > > > resources....if not all.... > > > > > make me know i'm also interested on this problem and i believe > > > > > that sooner or later i'll meet memory leakage problem on my app... > > > > > at the moment isn't so heavy.... > > > > > bye Patrizio > > > > > > > 2009/7/20 SunilBansal <[email protected]> > > > > > > > HI All, > > > > > > > I am facing memory leakage problem in my application. I searched on > > > > > Google but i found that memory leakage may be because of EXT JS > > > > > because of some cyclic references in between JSNI and DOM objects > and > > > > > browser is not able to handle these DOM objects for garbage > > > > > collection. > > > > > > > I am using following technologies in my application : - > > > > > > > GWT 1.6.4 > > > > > GWT EXT > > > > > Gilead > > > > > > > When i explorer my code then i found some reason that may be cause > of > > > > > Memory Leakage as :- > > > > > > > 1.) While i am clearing the widget or setting it's reference to > null > > > > > then i am not removing the listeners explicitly. > > > > > > > But i am feeling, this memory leakage is not only because of this > not > > > > > removing listener explicitly and now i am not able to understand > how > > > > > can i remove this problem. > > > > > > > So, please tell me if anybody have an idea? > > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > > > Sanj > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT-Ext Developer Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-ext?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
