Is there any way to extract the client machine's IP address into a log
message sent to RemoteLogger?

Thanks a lot,
cmr

On Oct 28, 6:53 am, "Fred Sauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I suspected:   Error:[ERROR] Line 25: Unexpected element
> 'set-configuration-property'
>
> That's an indication of needing features from GWT that are newer than 1.5.
> You can follow instructions on how to build your own GWT from trunk 
> here:http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/makinggwtbetter.html
>
> HTH
> Fred Sauer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Madhavi Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here are the compilation errors:
>
> > ====================================================================
> > Information:Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
> > Information:Compilation completed with 39 errors and 1 warning
> > Information:39 errors
> > Information:1 warning
> > Error:[ERROR] Line 25: Unexpected element 'set-configuration-property'
> > Error:Failure while parsing XML
> > Error:at
> > com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.DefaultSchema.onUnexpectedElement(DefaultSchema.java:80)
> > Error:at
> > com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.Schema.onUnexpectedElement(Schema.java:93)
> > Error:at
> > com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.ReflectiveParser$Impl.startElement(ReflectiveParser.java:186)
> > Error:at
> > com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.startElement(AbstractSAXParser.java:501)
> > Error:at
> > com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.AbstractXMLDocumentParser.emptyElement(AbstractXMLDocumentParser.java:179)
> > Error:at
> > com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanStartElement(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.java:1339)
> > Error:at
> > com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl$FragmentContentDriver.next(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.java:2747)
> > Error:at
> > com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentScannerImpl.next(XMLDocumentScannerImpl.java:648)
> > Error:at
> > com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanDocument(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.java:510)
> > Error:at
> > com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(XML11Configuration.java:807)
> > Error:at
> > com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(XML11Configuration.java:737)
> > Error:at
> > com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XMLParser.parse(XMLParser.java:107)
> > Error:at
> > com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.parse(AbstractSAXParser.java:1205)
> > Error:at
> > com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp.SAXParserImpl$JAXPSAXParser.parse(SAXParserImpl.java:522)
> > Error:at
> > com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.ReflectiveParser$Impl.parse(ReflectiveParser.java:310)
> > Error:at
> > com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.ReflectiveParser$Impl.access$100(ReflectiveParser.java:48)
> > Error:at
> > com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.ReflectiveParser.parse(ReflectiveParser.java:381)
> > Error:at
> > com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDefLoader.nestedLoad(ModuleDefLoader.java:243)
> > Error:at
> > com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDefSchema$BodySchema.__inherits_begin(ModuleDefSchema.java:194)
> > Error:at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1.invoke(Unknown Source)
> > Error:at
> > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> > Error:at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> > Error:at
> > com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.HandlerMethod.invokeBegin(HandlerMethod.java:223)
> > Error:at
> > com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.ReflectiveParser$Impl.startElement(ReflectiveParser.java:257)
> > Error:at
> > com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDefLoader$1.load(ModuleDefLoader.java:155)
> > Error:at
> > com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDefLoader.doLoadModule(ModuleDefLoader.java:269)
> > Error:at
> > com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDefLoader.loadFromClassPath(ModuleDefLoader.java:127)
> > Error:at
> > com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDefLoader.loadFromClassPath(ModuleDefLoader.java:108)
> > Error:at com.google.gwt.dev.GWTCompiler.run(GWTCompiler.java:562)
> > Error:at com.google.gwt.dev.GWTCompiler.run(GWTCompiler.java:554)
> > Error:at com.google.gwt.dev.GWTCompiler.main(GWTCompiler.java:214)
> > Error:[ERROR] Line 22: Unexpected exception while processing element
> > 'inherits'
> > Error:at
> > com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.ReflectiveParser$Impl.parse(ReflectiveParser.java:334)
> > Error:at
> > com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.DefaultSchema.onHandlerException(DefaultSchema.java:56)
> > Error:at
> > com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.Schema.onHandlerException(Schema.java:65)
> > Error:at
> > com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.HandlerMethod.invokeBegin(HandlerMethod.java:233)
> > Error:[ERROR] Line 6: Unexpected exception while processing element
> > 'inherits'
>
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Fred Sauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I should have mentioned that you need to be building from GWT trunk to get
> >> some of the features that were used to put in configurable log message
> >> formatting (a few commits back). I fairly certain the r275 jar will not 
> >> work
> >> with GWT 1.5 at this point.
> >> If that doesn't work, can you send a detailed error message?
>
> >> Thanks
> >> Fred Sauer
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:55 PM, cmr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> Using only the new jar file results in compile error on the line
> >>> <inherits name="com.allen_sauer.gwt.log.gwt-log-OFF" />.
>
> >>> Does the jar file gwt-log-r275.jar needs to be used in conjunction
> >>> with gwt-log-2.5.2.jar?
> >>> Also not clear on what exactly the new feature is. Does this mean if
> >>> the default log level is OFF and extended to log_level DEBUG, any log
> >>> level at run time will show debug level messages?
>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> cmr
>
> >>> On Oct 26, 8:49 pm, "Fred Sauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> > I just committed new functionality in r275 which allows any of the
> >>> seven
> >>> > standard log levels to be specified in the 'log_level' URL parameter or
> >>> > gwt:property meta tag. The effective compile time and runtime log
> >>> levels
> >>> > will be adjusted to their respective closest valid values. Feedback on
> >>> this
> >>> > new feature is welcome.
> >>> > Fred Sauer
> >>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Frederik Sauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>> > > On Oct 22, 2008, at 12:34 PM, cmr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> > >> Fred,
>
> >>> > >> In production we will not be able to programatically make the change
> >>> > >> though since we will just ship the generated javascript code. So in
> >>> > >> this case we will need to compile with all levels that we may want
> >>> to
> >>> > >> debug with in production?
>
> >>> > > For now, yes. I'll look at changing this in the future. Your
> >>> workaround
> >>> > > could be to create your own request parameter that sets the desired
> >>> log
> >>> > > level programatically in your onModuleLoad().
>
> >>> > > Fred
>
> >>> > >> Thanks for your prompt responses,
> >>> > >> cmr
>
> >>> > >> On Oct 21, 6:17 pm, Frederik Sauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> > >>> The URL parameter can only be one of the three levels you compiled.
> >>> > >>> However you can programatically set the intermediate levels via the
> >>> > >>> Log.set...() methods.
>
> >>> > >>> I can see how this makes the use of the URL parameter confusing.
> >>> I'll
> >>> > >>> look at simplifying the behavior in a future release.
>
> >>> > >>> Fred
> >>> > >>> On 10/21/08, cmr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> > >>>  Fred,
>
> >>> > >>>  It looks like there is no hierarchy for compile time levels. It
> >>> uses
> >>> > >>>> default for all the levels that are not compiled in but used
> >>> during
> >>> > >>>> run time? Is that right?
> >>> > >>>> For example,
> >>> > >>>> In my .gwt.xml file I have
>
> >>> > >>>  <inherits name="com.allen_sauer.gwt.log.gwt-log-ERROR" />
> >>> > >>>> <extend-property name="log_level" values="DEBUG,TRACE"/>
>
> >>> > >>>  Then in URL parameters or html file if log_level is set to
> >>> anything
> >>> > >>>> other than DEBUG or TRACE it will always default to ERROR.
>
> >>> > >>>  So it looks like we do need to compile with all levels if we need
> >>> > >>>> access to different levels in debugging in production.
>
> >>> > >>>  Thanks,
> >>> > >>>> cmr
>
> >>> > >>>  On Sep 11, 8:08 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >>> > >>>>> Sunil
>
> >>> > >>>  There is a hierarchy. I would compile trace and error levels. Use
> >>> the
> >>> > >>>>> gwt meta property and URL parameter as you suggested.
>
> >>> > >>>  Compiling more levels cause longer compilation time. Compiling at
> >>> a
> >>> > >>>>> lower level caused less code to be excluded in the output and
> >>> also
> >>> > >>>>> introduces some overhead.
>
> >>> > >>>  Fred
> >>> > >>>>> On 9/11/08, Sunil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> > >>>  Thanks for the response. I was assuming that there is a level
> >>> > >>>>>> hierarchy for compile settings, i.e., that since I compiled for
> >>> > >>>>>> DEBUG,
> >>> > >>>>>> then INFO/WARN/FATAL/ERROR are enabled which doesn't seem to be
> >>> the
> >>> > >>>>>> case.
>
> >>> > >>>  In my scenario, I want to be able to log ERROR and FATAL in
> >>> > >>>>>> production, but have the option to see all levels if necessary
> >>> while
> >>> > >>>>>> debugging. So here's what I might need to do.
>
> >>> > >>>  - In the module.xml, compile all levels
> >>> > >>>>>> <inherits name="com.allen_sauer.gwt.log.gwt-log-OFF" />
> >>> > >>>>>> <extend-property name="log_level" values="TRACE, DEBUG, INFO,
> >>> WARN,
> >>> > >>>>>> ERROR, FATAL"/>
>
> >>> > >>>  - In the host file
> >>> > >>>>>> <meta name="gwt:property" content="log_level=ERROR">
> >>> > >>>>>> Assuming that this will also log both ERROR and FATAL.
>
> >>> > >>>  - If I then need to debug, I can use the URL parameter
> >>> > >>>>>> log_level=DEBUG
>
> >>> > >>>  Is there a runtime overhead to compiling all levels, and by
> >>> default
> >>> > >>>>>> setting log_level to ERROR in the host file?
>
> >>> > >>>  Thanks
> >>> > >>>>>> Sunil.
>
> >>> > >>>  On Sep 9, 10:15 pm, "Fred Sauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> > >>>>>>> Sunil,
> >>> > >>>>>>> Since you're compiling with OFF and DEBUG compile time log
> >>> levels
> >>> > >>>>>>> in
> >>> > >>>>>>> your
> >>> > >>>>>>> *.gwt.xml file, INFO is not a valid *compile time* log
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gwt-log" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-log?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to