Makarenko, The reason was to be able to provide support for POJOs that need to use the same log method in client code and on the server.
It should be easy enough you checkout the gwt-log source code from SVN and make any overriding changes in your own project. The project contains an ant build script which you can run to build the gwt-log jar. If you like you could put your own project in your own SVN repository, then use svn:externals to reference the gwt-log directories. Fred Sauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:28 PM, mdeg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fred > > Why you did so? > It is only additional problems for developers. > > > On 18 нояб, 22:11, "Fred Sauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Martin, > > Sounds like you're trying to use the gwt-log jar file directly for > > development. That won't work because of the method signatures in the > *.class > > files in the jar (which are different from the *.java files). > > > > However, if you grab the gwt-log source code directly from Subversion you > > should be able to make your changes as expected. > > http://code.google.com/p/gwt-log/source/checkout > > > > Fred Sauer > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:10 AM, maku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Because of few controlling possibilities for DivLogger I would like to > > > write my own (GXT based) UI implementation of a logger. > > > > > So I thought the best way woud be to extend AbstractLogger. But I'm > > > not able to implement/override methods. > > > > > When I try to implement the log method (-> abstract void log(int > > > logLevel, String message) ) I get the error "Cannot override the final > > > methods from AbstractLogger " -> I've no idea why this error occurs > > > because of the method is defined abstract. I get the same message when > > > I try to override the public methods. > > > > > Can you explain what's wrong with my approach??? > > > > > TIA > > > Martin > > > > > On 17 Nov., 18:28, "Fred Sauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What specifically would you like to see changed in order to support > your > > > own > > > > loggers? > > > > > > Fred Sauer > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:47 AM, maku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > I would like to write my own logger implementation. > > > > > > > But the structure of the existing loggers prevent writing my own. > > > > > > > Is there anything planned to support this. > > > > > > > TIA > > > > > > > Martin- Скрыть цитируемый текст - > > > > - Показать цитируемый текст - > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gwt-log" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-log?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
