I changed the GWTMojo to run compile phase, rather than package
phase.  The makes the shell startup a LOT faster (don't need to run
GWTCompiler and make a war, just to run shell).  I don't think there
will be any problems with this, but I still need to check some corner
cases.

On Aug 28, 3:43 pm, Charlie Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will check into that.
>
> Note though that once you launch hosted mode, you don't have to keep
> re-launching it, you can make changes, refresh, and see them there
> (not server side changes of course, but you know what I mean).
>
> On Aug 28, 11:48 am, Arthur Kalmenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Great, thank you Charlie, it works. Just one note, I think that the
> > sample POM files shouldn't include compile in the goals for running
> > gwt:gwt. It confused me for a while there because it was taking an
> > awfully long time to launch hosted mode (it had to run the GWT
> > compiler on the app for each launch of hosted mode). The compile goal
> > should probably only run when you package the GWT app as a WAR file.
>
> > On Aug 28, 10:17 am, Charlie Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > I found the problem, the @requiresDependencyResolution in the GWTMojo
> > > was provided.  Not sure why (or even if I did it ;)).  I changed it to
> > > compile, and made one quick change to the BuildClasspathUtil, and it
> > > works.  That might give us too many dependencies in some contexts,
> > > possibly, but it fixes this specific issue, and is arguably what we
> > > will have to do.  (I also updated the regular sample application to
> > > use the new plugin and test this - (http://gwt-
> > > maven.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/maven-googlewebtoolkit2-sample).
>
> > > Thanks for reporting this.
>
> > > ALSO NOTE - I changed the name of the build I just did to 2.0-beta22-
> > > SNAPSHOT and removed the "ccbranch" one.  I did this for 2 reasons,
> > > one to avoid the latest version number thing brought up here, and two
> > > to use the conventional SNAPSHOT so I can just overwrite the same one
> > > if and when we find more issues.
>
> > > USE 2.0-beta22-SNAPSHOT for testing the branch (but this is NOT an
> > > official GWT-Maven release, yet)
>
> > > On Aug 28, 9:22 am, Charlie Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Ok, several things here.
>
> > > > First, I updated the normal sample app (http://gwt-
> > > > maven.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/maven-googlewebtoolkit2-sample/) to use
> > > > the new ccbranch of the plugin.  I did this to test multi-module,
> > > > including a GWT library from one project in another, and so on.  I get
> > > > exactly the same problem, the build runtime classpath isn't getting
> > > > the compile scoped dependencies (those that are either scoped compile,
> > > > or have nothing, which means they inherit default scope - compile).
> > > > It should get the compile ones, as they are supposed to be available
> > > > in ALL scopes (the runtime should ADD the runtime stuff, but not have
> > > > just the runtime and above).
>
> > > > I will look at this ASAP.
>
> > > > On Aug 28, 9:12 am, Arthur Kalmenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > I tried Mirko's suggestion and it now the jars do include the source
> > > > > files. I think I've also better understood the problem with the
> > > > > classpaths. This seems to be a scoping issue (as you suggested). I
> > > > > have the third party library scoped as provided so the gwt:compile
> > > > > goal runs with it in the classpath:
>
> > > > > DEBUG SCRIPT CLASSPATH LIST
> > > > >    /home/arthur/.m2/repository/com/google/gwt/gwt-user/1.5.1/gwt-
> > > > > user-1.5.1.jar
> > > > >    /home/arthur/.m2/repository/com/google/gwt/gwt-dev/1.5.1/gwt-
> > > > > dev-1.5.1-linux.jar
> > > > >    /home/arthur/work/mshab/mshab-demo/src/main/java
> > > > >    /home/arthur/work/mshab/mshab-demo/src/main/resources
> > > > >    /home/arthur/work/mshab/mshab-demo/classes
> > > > >    /home/arthur/work/mshab/mshab-demo/target/classes
> > > > >    /home/arthur/.m2/repository/com/sinai/mshab/mshab-format/1.0-
> > > > > SNAPSHOT/mshab-format-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>
> > > > > However, when it gets to running gwt:gwt, the classpath changes and
> > > > > doesn't include mshab-format:
>
> > > > > DEBUG SCRIPT CLASSPATH LIST
> > > > >    /home/arthur/.m2/repository/com/google/gwt/gwt-user/1.5.1/gwt-
> > > > > user-1.5.1.jar
> > > > >    /home/arthur/.m2/repository/com/google/gwt/gwt-dev/1.5.1/gwt-
> > > > > dev-1.5.1-linux.jar
> > > > >    /home/arthur/work/mshab/mshab-demo/src/main/java
> > > > >    /home/arthur/work/mshab/mshab-demo/src/main/resources
> > > > >    /home/arthur/work/mshab/mshab-demo/classes
> > > > >    /home/arthur/work/mshab/mshab-demo/target/classes
>
> > > > > This is why hosted mode says mshab-format.xml isn't in the classpath.
> > > > > I tried to scope it as runtime, but that didn't do anything (except
> > > > > not include it during the compile step).
>
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Arthur Kalmenson
>
> > > > > On Aug 28, 5:27 am, Charlie Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > You can also use a source jar, if that is your preference, just so
> > > > > > long as the source is on the classpath.  I will try some third party
> > > > > > lib stuff today to make sure it's not a classpath scope issue with 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > branch (which is possible - but I don't think that's it, just need 
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > check).
>
> > > > > > On Aug 27, 4:35 pm, Arthur Kalmenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Good point, I don't have the source code in my JAR. I created a
> > > > > > > separate source jar using source:jar, placed that in my local 
> > > > > > > repo and
> > > > > > > made a dependency on it. Nevertheless, I'm still getting the same
> > > > > > > errors. Maybe if I could package the class files and source files
> > > > > > > together it might work (which is what I did when I was using Ant).
> > > > > > > However, I looked around and I couldn't figure out how that would 
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > done.
>
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Arthur Kalmenson
>
> > > > > > > On Aug 27, 3:51 pm, Charlie Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > I will try some third party modules too - I honestly haven't 
> > > > > > > > checked
> > > > > > > > that yet.  Just one thing before I look into it though, make 
> > > > > > > > sure your
> > > > > > > > modules and dependencies have the SOURCE in them if they are GWT
> > > > > > > > libraries (third party modules usually do, but if they are your 
> > > > > > > > own,
> > > > > > > > either make sure the source is in them, or that you include a 
> > > > > > > > special
> > > > > > > > source jar as a dependency).
>
> > > > > > > > On Aug 27, 3:00 pm, Arthur Kalmenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > OK, so while launching hosted mode works for a very small 
> > > > > > > > > project that
> > > > > > > > > uses only GWT widgets, I get classpath issues when I start 
> > > > > > > > > importing
> > > > > > > > > 3rd party modules in my .xml.gwt file. This third party 
> > > > > > > > > module lives
> > > > > > > > > in my local repository and is included as a dependency in the 
> > > > > > > > > same way
> > > > > > > > > gwt-user is included. However, when I run gwt:gwt, the hosted 
> > > > > > > > > mode log
> > > > > > > > > shows that it was unable to inherit the third party module 
> > > > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > > it's not in the classpath. I tried adding the module into the 
> > > > > > > > > compile
> > > > > > > > > targets, but to no effect (and it doesn't make sense that it 
> > > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > since the compilation should pick up the additional modules). 
> > > > > > > > > I'm not
> > > > > > > > > sure if this is a problem with the new version or something 
> > > > > > > > > that I did
> > > > > > > > > wrong...
>
> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > Arthur Kalmenson
>
> > > > > > > > > On Aug 26, 3:17 pm, Charlie Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > If anyone can help with testing the branch 
> > > > > > > > > > -http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-maven/browse_thread/thread/d2e35d5...
> > > > > > > > > > - it would be greatly appreciated.  It does a few things 
> > > > > > > > > > differently
> > > > > > > > > > (see the thread for details), and though it's more elegant, 
> > > > > > > > > > I am not
> > > > > > > > > > sure it addresses all situations, as it hasn't been 
> > > > > > > > > > extensively tested
> > > > > > > > > > - yet.
>
> > > > > > > > > > It's been around a few weeks though, and several people are 
> > > > > > > > > > using it
> > > > > > > > > > successfully (myself included).
>
> > > > > > > > > > If you can, it would be much appreciated if you grab it, 
> > > > > > > > > > build it, and
> > > > > > > > > > test it with some existing projects.
>
> > > > > > > > > > I want to get all the feedback I can, to address stuff, 
> > > > > > > > > > BEFORE it gets
> > > > > > > > > > merged (I will get feedback after, that I am sure of, but 
> > > > > > > > > > trying to
> > > > > > > > > > mitigate that if I can ;)).
>
> > > > > > > > > > I might try to merge it sometime this weekend if I get 
> > > > > > > > > > time, unless I
> > > > > > > > > > have any other feedback about problems.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gwt-maven" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-maven?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to