There is a separation on test cases, if that is what you mean? http://gwt-maven.googlecode.com/svn/docs/maven-googlewebtoolkit2-plugin/testing.html
The GWTTestCase ones, which are only relative to CLIENT SIDE / translatable model and controller (not even UI frankly, but that is a point of debate with some), whether or not shared, use the "gwtFilter" property to be separated - the default is prefix "GwtTest*". Standard test cases use suffix *Test". Not sure if that's what you mean, but that is how the testing support differentiates. On Sep 10, 9:25 am, Arthur Kalmenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Will there be separation between GWT code and regular Java code right? > This separation should especially be in the test cases. > > There are a number of use cases where you have code that runs both on > the client and on the server (domain objects is one example). There > are also other use cases where there is client side code that is not > directly tied to GWT widgets (for example, following the MVC pattern > on the client side would only see GWT code in the View, but the > Controller and Model will be reusable). > > In these cases, a separation between GWTTestCases and regular test > cases is a must. I frequently use TestNG, EasyMock and other testing > tools to test client side business logic that does not directly use > GWT widgets. If there is no separation between them in the archetype, > the GWT compiler will try to compile the non GWTTestCase code and > fail. > > I don't know if I'm being very clear, let me know if it's confusing. I > can post this comment on the issue tracker as well (and maybe help out > too :P). > > Regards, > Arthur Kalmenson > > On Sep 9, 4:37 pm, Charlie Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Nope, it does not. The archetype has been ancient for quite some > > time, but there is an issue in the tracker to update it (just haven't > > gotten to it). Contributors and patches, etc, are welcome. > > > On Sep 9, 2:22 pm, Jeff Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Does this include an updated version of the archetype? > > > > On Sep 7, 5:33 am, Charlie Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > New version, with a lot of refactoring, and fixes for many issues, is > > > > now available in the > > > > repo:http://gwt-maven.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/mavenrepo/com/totsp/gwt/mav... > > > > > This version > > > > 1. Works with GWT 1.5.2 from central repo > > > > 2. Does the "automatic" mode processing differently, using the > > > > dependency plugin > > > > 3. Has rewritten GWTTestCase support (which does script writing like > > > > other mojos) > > > > 4. Has I18N support > > > > 5. Was refactored to remove a lot of duplicated code and use a few > > > > interfaces and abstract classes and such so it is easier to understand > > > > and work with when you are looking at the source > > > > 6. Addresses about 15 or so issues from the tracker > > > > 7. Does NOT supoort the bean generation stuff anymore (there were too > > > > many issues, and we no longer have a maintainer for that - so it is > > > > gone until further notice - if the maintainer comes back, or someone > > > > else wants to volunteer - and we address all the issues [see tracker] > > > > then it will be back). > > > > > This version was based on all the work and input done in the recent > > > > refactoring > > > > branch:http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-maven/browse_thread/thread/83664ca.... > > > > Thanks to Mirko and Arthur, and others for help and testing, etc. > > > > > Check out the > > > > docs:http://gwt-maven.googlecode.com/svn/docs/maven-googlewebtoolkit2-plug.... > > > > (I am pretty proud of the docs ;) - we now have some that use the > > > > Maven standard, with all goals and properties, source xref, javadocs, > > > > and from there we expand on what it provides a bit.) > > > > > Also the samples are updated to use the new > > > > version:http://gwt-maven.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/maven-googlewebtoolkit2-plu...... > > > > > If you find issues, please note them here and via the tracker. > > > > > thanks --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gwt-maven" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-maven?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
