Ok, I added you as a project member. If you want to make a branch and work there, that would be fine. I know everyone is busy (as am I), so there are no expectations, just trying to make it easier on you (as opposed to maintaining and patching a custom version locally). And, at the same time, better for the project as it can leverage your contributions.
In other news . . . book is going to be good, I am pretty proud of it thus far. As for Devoxx, yes, I was lined up to be a speaker with a "GWT" related talk, and that would surely have involved at least a little GWT-Maven, but, I have bailed out. It's a long story. Maarten Volders is still doing the GWT talk, but I won't be able to be there. On Oct 10, 1:07 pm, eldzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Know that feeling, the same for me :) > > Yes, I am very interested. It would be more comfortable to work on a > branch then patching things. And for the release, I agree with you, > you have an overview, better then me :) > > For this 149 issue I want to make an improvement so you don't have to > type so many information into the definition file, you just specify > pom files and all will be done automatically. Then it will be prepared > for pre-release form. We are using v.24 patched with this on daily > basis on Linux and Windows machines so if something arises I will fix > it. > > I am curious about the book and maybe we see us on devoxx :) > > On Oct 10, 2:31 pm, Charlie Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Eldzi, I will get that one in the next time I have time to do a > > release (on the last push for my Android book at the moment, besides > > the day job, so ultra busy). > > > Are you interested in joining the project though as a contributor, so > > you can just go ahead and commit patches? I would probably still be > > more comfortable if you let me do releases for now (until we go > > through a few), but you would then be able to go ahead and commit and > > build snapshots? We can always use more contributors, if you are > > *actually* interested. Let me know. > > > On Oct 9, 2:51 am, eldzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Issue 149 -http://code.google.com/p/gwt-maven/issues/detail?id=149 > > > addresses this problem. Configuring correct artifact definition file > > > and running gwt goal will modify final scripts and allow you to modify > > > code directly in the projects. I have one modification for definition > > > file simplification in mind but currently it is working and it is > > > tested on a real project. > > > > On 8. Okt, 14:42 h., larshub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > How is the plugin to configure if you habe an application with several > > > > modules where each can have gwt code? > > > > > example: > > > > app > > > > - mod1 > > > > - mod2 (contains gwt code) > > > > - mod3 (contains gwt code) > > > > > From the project app I want to launch the hosted mode browser. I know, > > > > I could install the modules and have the dependency on them. But then > > > > I have not the flexibility to change a class in a module and directly > > > > press the refresh button in the hosted mode browser. > > > > > Does anybody have a suggestion? > > > > > thanks > > > > Lars --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gwt-maven" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-maven?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
