I changed it here, I don't even play a lawyer on TV, so I don't know the details, but I did click the button to move the license over ;). (Everyone agreed, so should be fine.)
On Jan 8, 4:55 am, "Mirko Nasato" <[email protected]> wrote: > Since both GWT and Maven use the Apache license, it's a good idea to > use the same one for the plugin. > > It's not a big deal in practice, but there were doubts about whether > LGPL v2 and Apache had some incompatible clauses, which I think have > been addressed in LGPL v3. > > Cheers > > Mirko > > 2009/1/7 <[email protected]>: > > > > > Ahh! Ok, IANAL, although I do date one. :-D Thanks for your > > flexibility, Charlie, and the whole GWT-Maven team! > > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Charlie Collins > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Ok, will do. The Mojo plugin is already importing stuff though, as > >> far as I know. I was told LGPL (which is what GWT-Maven has always > >> been, rather than GPL), is fine and compatible with Mojo and they > >> could use stuff directly. I don't know the ramifications of that, if > >> that somehow muddies the Mojo project, or it has to be multi-licensed > >> or something, but that's what I was told. > > >> I will change this one to Apache though, everyone did agree and give > >> notice. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gwt-maven" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-maven?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
