On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 11:24:04AM +0200, Kenneth Nielsen wrote: > Just throwing an idea out there (even though you said a code repository > was out of the question). A code repository could be made discoverable, > if it was required to hand a raw text file next to the script, in some > predictable naming scheme.
I meant a different kind of discoverabilty (probably). If a central authority exists that manages a list of the scripts (manually, by receiving pull requests or whatever) then we have a defined place where to find them all but the central authority is a bottleneck I want to avoid. And, of course, I want to avoid the central authority being me... If everyone sets up a github repo or something then everyone can happily manage his own scripts but it is difficult to find specific Gwyddion scripts among the 3 milions of other things. But if you think the github search is good enough then this might be an option. The code repository on Sourceforge has no reasonable permissions granularity (I do not want to give the world write permissions to everything) and still would require adding people to the project (central management). So this is really no option. An ideal solution would be specialised repo/collection that would contain only Gwyddion scripts and everyone would be able to manage his own. But that I cannot see how to set up easily. Regards, Yeti ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Gwyddion-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwyddion-users
