On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:54:50AM +0100, OC wrote: > OK. I find it strange, but it may only be a beginner's opinion. I'll > have to take care of that behavior. It's dangerous that a click on a > checkbox closes the work without possibility for saving. No problem if a > click on a button called "Delete" does this, but this is surprising for > a checkbox. It's even more surprising because when another channel is > still checked, it only hides the unchecked channel and does not close > the work.
Unchecking the checkbox is simply another way to close the window (and thus close the file if it was the last one). You can use the checkboxes only to show windows and always close windows using the close button. Since the data browser shows the content of the file corresponding to the currently active window, closing all windows of a file would make its data inaccessible. Therefore the file is closed. This is not the first time a similar question was asked. So a recap... IMO the current behaviour facilitates an efficient workflow and I like it. I will not invest my time into the implementation of a different behaviour but I am open to patches implementing a different behaviour, so long as they also make possible to continue using Gwyddion without any annoying ‘do you want to save foo?’ questions. Regards, Yeti ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Gwyddion-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwyddion-users
