On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Bill Brush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Ryan Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 9:11 AM -0500 10/13/08, Bill Brush wrote: > > > > > > Looks like they're still testing. the weak points aren't the vehicles, > but the fact that the command point has a wireless link. As long as the > transmission and crypto are secure you're good, as soon as that goes down, > you have a problem. The bigger issue is that your command post, even if > mobile, is still an emitter. > > > > Some independent operational functions by the UCTV would be useful. > > > > That was my thought also, but AFAIK it hasn't been a real issue with > the Predator drones. Or has it? > > Bill > > _______________________________________________ > Gzg-l mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l > Not really had many issues yet because we use them against combatants well below our tech level. Many times they are used for snooping so they are not active against anyone looking to jam them up or cut communications. -- Chris Slavensky --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ground Zero Games" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gzg-group?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
_______________________________________________ Gzg-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
