We do 1901. There is a posture shown in many contemporary illustrations where the bust is pushed forward and the butt is pushed backward, such that a standing woman is bent into an S-shaped curve (think Gibson Girl). I can hardly present this un-natural, but historically correct, posture as flattering. (It's really hard on the back too - I've tried it.) But many dated contemporary photographs show women not exhibiting this posture. So I'm going to have to be careful playing the "flattering" card here. And the silhouette I present as the one to copy will have to be taken from the moderate end of what was done in our period.

But isn't much (or even most) of that look an optical illusion rather than actual physical posture? Lots of floof in the front and a pad for the buttocks should give that look.

Fashionable contemporary corsets were cut to make the body do that. (Norah Waugh's book "Corsets and Crinolines" has the pattern I used for mine.) The front floof, and not pads but the cut of the skirt in back, accentuated this look. But throughout the period of this corset shape, the earlier non-S-shape corsets were available, at least according to Sears catalogs. So I'm not insisting that any of our living history women do that to themselves, since something similar can be accomplished by a little front floof and contemporary skirt cutting.

       CarolynKayta Barrows
dollmaker, fibre artist, textillian
         www.FunStuft.com

             //// \\\
            ////-@@\\\
           ((((   7 )))
            (((  <> ))))
               )   ((((((
          /----\   /---\))

_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to