Thanks! That makes a lot of sense.
Sharon

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Heather Rose Jones
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 10:07 AM
To: Historical Costume
Subject: Re: [h-cost] 10th - 11th C. German


> On Friday 17 February 2006 12:11 am, Heather Rose Jones wrote: [snip]
>
>> There isn't so much a "problem" with the neckline as that it's a 
>> rather unusually shaped neckline.  The particular angle of the 
>> photograph is also not very good for seeing what's going on with the 
>> neck.  Asymmetric "side-opening" necklines are quite common among the 
>> surviving garments of this era (what few there are).

On Feb 17, 2006, at 12:29 AM, Sharon at Collierfam.com wrote:
> OK, so I'm showing my ignorance, but why "side-opening" necklines?
> I'd think
> they'd be more difficult than symmetrical, center front openings.
> Sharon
>

What follows is largely off-the-cuff speculation, but the answer is  
most likely to lie in how these openings developed historically.  The  
most common neck opening configuration of the Roman Empire and sub- 
Roman era was a horizontal slit, sometimes with slight dishing on the  
front side of the opening.  In garments woven in one piece on wide  
vertical looms, this slit could be created during the weaving  
complete with selveges (on the loom, it would be positioned  
vertically during weaving).

Modifications to this neckline style in the early medieval period  
include a lot of things other than center-front slits, and seem to  
have developed from different motivations and for different  
purposes.  Examples include:

Narrowing the opening-as-worn by fastening the front and back edges  
together closer to the (wearer's) neck, as we see in the 8th century  
tunic associated with St. Ebbo, where there is a button-and-loop  
closure on each shoulder.

A double layer of fabric in the body of the garment, with vertical  
slits in the layers on alternate sides of the neck, each fastening at  
the top, so that when closed the inner and outer fabrics overlap and  
there's no direct "hole" from the outside to the inside of the  
garment.  This is seen in the very detailed technical drawings of the  
11th c. Danish "Viborg shirt" and also appears to be the underlying  
construction in the 12th c. alb of William II of SIcily (another  
garment where the decorative parts are original but the garment has  
been re-made at various times).

If you visualize enlarged neck openings developing from a horizontal- 
slit opening rather than a circular opening, then if you start the  
vertical slit at the side of the existing horizontal slit, you end up  
with only one "corner" to deal with, rather than the two corners you  
get if you position the vertical slit in center front.  Also, a  
number of the early side-opening necklines incorporate a decorative  
vertical band as part of the slit, and garments of the early medieval  
period often already had a vertical decorative band approximately at  
the side of the neck opening, deriving from the clavii.

Just  a few thoughts on the topic.

Heather
--
Heather Rose Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.heatherrosejones.com
LJ:hrj


_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected] http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to