In a message dated 4/25/2006 7:13:23 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it's because the public is becomming better educated about costume history, I also think that it will get better in the future too. Costume Literature has jumped tenfold since I left University, so have the skill levels of the majority of students. People are pushing themselves further and further, trying to find out how those garments were made and worn in history, not just trying to capture a look. *********************** The end of the "studio" system contributed to this greatly. The "queens of the silver screen" don't really have as much power as they used to. But in the 1960s there started a vogue for accuracy that hit its height I think in the late 70s. The 1st clothing from a movie I remember ever noticing was "Thoroughly Modern Millie"....some beautiful and very accurate costumes in there....with great character. I'd say the pinnacle is "Little Dorrit" [early 80s]. This rise closely follows the rise in costume research and scholarly investigation of clothes happening at the same time. Now I feel it's moving into an area I like but is not really "accuracy". I call it the "historically informed" look. Where there is obviously a healthy respect and knowledge of the period historically, but things are manipulated to achieve effects. The rise in popularity of fantasy films has something to do with it. Sandy Powell, one of my fave designers, is very good at this. She loves correct cuts, but will play with fabric a lot. So too another of my fave designers, Colleen Atwood. Of course the British and Europeans have been doing some very accurate portrayals for a looooong time. _______________________________________________ h-costume mailing list [email protected] http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
