Hi Albertcat,
Thanks for your posting, i am always willing to take critisism, and you are right it would have ben more beautifull with a ruffle on the skirt, but dresses without ruffles also excists, take for instance the weddingdress in cut of womens clothes, wich has the same puffed trimmings as the yellow dress, and no ruffle. But to tell you the truth it was because i wanted to finish that dress, that i discharged the ruffle, it had already taken much two much of my sparetime, and i had to end the matter. I also said it would be the last dress i would make, but i have to take my words and eat them, because i have another dress in mind for this winter season...............

Thanks for your note.................

Bjarne
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 11:39 PM
Subject: Re: [h-cost] finally pictures from my costumer


MMmmmmmmm....yummy butter yellow. The embroidery is stunning.

But of course I have to complain. I miss the ruffle on the petticoat. I
think it needs it, especially with the fancier "bird" stomacher. The petticoat looks unfinished in the context of 18th century wide pannier gowns. Were it worn
over pads and more modest without a train and such, the ruffle-less
petticoat might fly. But my mind wants to see some fussy 3-d something peaking out
from  the front edges of the gown. It's just part of the aesthetic.

But don't mind me....it's a beautiful stunning  ensemble.
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume



_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to