Hi Suzi,
How about edging the tulle with the dress material, just a thin edge?
Bjarne
----- Original Message -----
From: "Suzi Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Historical Costume" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: [h-cost] not in UK but possible idea RE: Wedding Veil (inU.K
only please)
At 18:20 04/10/2006, you wrote:
If she is trying to be Period/Authentic, majority of the early Victorian
veils were hem or chapel length. I have only seen one veil (now 2) that
was
chin length that did not cover the face.
This isn't the one but pretty close.
http://collectionsonline.lacma.org/mwebimages/C_T08_MM/full/M83_231_21.jpg
If you can find a large enough square of lace that might work with having
to
hem.
Otherwise I vaguely remember hats worn in late Victorian to early
Edwardian.
Not a lot but not rare.
Thanks but authentic is not the thing - this is a Victorian *based* dress,
from a fashion plate, but the accessories, shoes, bridesmaids, and now
veil are not, or do not need to be authentic. There is so much around the
neckline, like flowers and lace etc. and she doesn't want them covered. It
is only the token thing of arriving at the altar with her face covered.
Lace here comes in 120" widths, so is far too wide to use unhemmed, which
is why I am not suggesting making it myself.
Suzi
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
