I'm reminded of coming across a 1940's newspaper clipping that shorts were being banned in some small Ontario town (which shall remain nameless in its shame) in the archives of Fort Malden, Parks Canada, when I was the resource centre specialist there.
Laugh, I thought I'd die. That edict didn't have much effect, did it? I'm tired of the baggy pants look too, but recently I met an contemporary (50's) who was wearing alarmingly tight, pencil-leg jeans and had dyed his hair in a ponytail. Not a good look either. Sheridan Alder ----- Original Message ---- From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 9:00:32 PM Subject: Re: [h-cost] How clothing style can effect law (RE to OT "Baggy") In a message dated 6/19/2007 4:05:37 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Delcambre is a small town and several town citizens complained about this "style" of dress Now you know the rest of the story. So if "several citizens" [I wonder how many] complained, say about churches in town because they were atheists, I'm sure the town council would create a law banning churches, right? The rest of the story sounds just like the 1st part of the story....stupid! What did you think I thought had happened? That it was just a whim? It's still pitiful. ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. _______________________________________________ h-costume mailing list h-costume@mail.indra.com http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume Get news delivered with the All new Yahoo! Mail. Enjoy RSS feeds right on your Mail page. Start today at http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca _______________________________________________ h-costume mailing list h-costume@mail.indra.com http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
