It could be that. I work in a health sciences library. But the first
reported cases, known as the "New Acquintance" seems to have sprung up
in England, shortly after Henry VII won the battle of Redmore Plain,
known later as Bosworth Field. Historians assume that some of the
foreign troops on Henry Tudor's side "imported" a new virus or a new
strain of virus most Englishmen and women had no resistance to.

It is possible that it was also an especially fast-moving and often
lethal influenza virus. If ever DNA testing is possible on the remains
of someone who is known to have died of it, it might be possible to id
what the sweating sickness was.

I know that not too long ago, it was discovered that many people today
of European descent actually show biological markers that prove their
ancestors were survivors of the Black Death. It would be interesting to
find out how many also survived the sweating sickness. It seems that
Henry VIII was correct in reassuring Anne Boleyn that few women fell
victim to it and more women survived it than men. Were most women
exposed to something that men were not, or had antibodies that men
didn't?

Henry VIII had an extreme fear of illness that is actually
understandable in view that for most of his reign, he had no legitimate
male heir. Also the precautions Henry VII took to guard his second son
from illness, not only speaks of ultraprotection of his sole male heir,
but I think, may also have stemmed from the sudden death of Prince
Arthur. Historian David Starkey points out in "Six Wives: The Queens of
Henry VIII" that there was no contemporary proof that Prince Arthur was
sickly or a weakling prior to his marriage to Catherine of Aragon. All
the existing evidence points to Arthur's final illness and death to have
been rather sudden and unexpected.

Cindy Abel

Cindy Abel 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of A. Thurman
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 3:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [h-cost] Re: Tudor Sweating sickness

I've been watching too and was surprised to find that the sweating
sickness outbreak was one of the things they got right!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweating_sickness

Also I have access to PubMed through work and several articles there
suggest it was a type of hantavirus passed by rodents.

Allison T.

On Jan 8, 2008 3:18 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:19:48 -0800 (PST)
> From: Julie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [h-cost] Comments on The Tudors
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I rented the disks from Blockbuster this weekend and had a couple of
questions/comments.
>
> There is substantial mention of a "sweating sickness" that killed
thousands during Henry VIII's time.  What was that?  No mention of
buboes like for plague or marks like smallpox.  Did this really happen
or was it just part of their story?  It was very contagious and people
were told to burn all clothing & bedding.  I believe consumption is
tuberculosis, right?  Any other old disease names with modern
equivalents I should know?
>
> I know the costumes were discussed when the show first came out  What
I found most jarring was anything from the neck up.  The hairstyles were
extremely modern.  Long hair was down & exposed. Crowns & headgear, at
least on the women, looked fantasy or Las Vegas.
>
> Julie in Ramona
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to