My two cents:
1) My late brother used to wear men's large Danskin ballet tights as long 
underwear under his (fashionably tight) jeans. I mention the male-dancer's 
tights as they might fit Bjarne better -- tights or pantyhose that are too 
small get uncomfortable pretty fast, either pulling on your kneecaps or 
creeping down until the crotch is between your knees. Which will be 
particularly uncomfy in 18th-century breeches!

2) Wikipedia says panty hose were first manufactured in 1965, but prior to 
that, there were little girls' and dancers' tights  -- I remember having them 
as a toddler at least as early as 1960.  Wikipedia attributes the full-body 
"leotard" (which went to the ankles) to, ahem, Jules Leotard, who died in 1870. 
(The first recorded use of "leotard" to describe a dancer's or acrobat's 
costume in English is 1886, according to Wikipedia again.)  The tights from my 
childhood weren't sheer like pantyhose -- indeed some of them were 
waffle-weave, like thermals -- but they came in flesh-tone colors (like "ballet 
pink", a slightly peachy pale pink) and might be what you remember wearing 
under your marching band skirt. They would have been warmer than pantyhose; 
living in upstate New York, with its cold winters, I remember continuing to 
prefer tights to pantyhose for winter wear through the mid-70s. Actually, I 
prefer them today; they last far longer and usually fit better. 
-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: Ruth Anne Baumgartner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

> As a former marching-band member, I'd like to second (belatedly) the 
> recommendation of pantyhose (or tights) to layer with Bjarne's period 
> stockings. 
> 
> > On a costume-history note: interestingly, I keep hearing that 
> pantyhose were invented in the late 'sixties, and certainly I didn't 
> routinely buy them for ordinary wear until '68 or so; but my friends 
> Connie, Joyce, another Joyce, Patty, Marilyn, Rita, and Marcia would 
> join me in testifying that our mothers found them, bought them, and 
> saved our musical knees with them as early as 1962. Can anyone else 
> pinpoint an earliest-available date, from her own experience? 
> 
> --Ruth Anne Baumgartner 
> scholar gypsy and amateur costumer 
> 
> On Jan 4, 2008, at 1:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
> 
> > 
> > In a message dated 1/4/2008 10:40:35 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 
> > 
> > The best bet may be to layer stockings. 
> > 
> > 
> > ************* 
> > 
> > This is what I was thinking too. 
> > 
> > Unless you want a more rustic look with the wool, I'd get a pair of 
> > pantyhose or tights. They are very warm in themselves, but put your 
> > silk stockings 
> > over them and you should be quite warm....unless it's like way 
> > below freezing. 
> > The modern super-stretchy tights would be very smooth and more 
> > than likely 
> > undetectable under your correct period stockings. 
> > 
> > Even if you do get some fine wool stockings, layering may be needed 
> > to keep 
> > you warm. Are there not depictions of men in layers of different 
> > colored 
> > stockings...some rolled down a bit to show the layers underneath? 
> > Or is that too 
> > early? Too dandy? 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > **************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape. 
> > http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > h-costume mailing list 
> > [email protected] 
> > http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> h-costume mailing list 
> [email protected] 
> http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume 
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to