Not really read, but it´s the technique described
in "Period Patterns for Stage and Screen". I
always liked the way the ruffs turned out, but
I´m beginning to doubt the historical accuracy of
the technique, so I thought I´d ask here.
Hanna
At 21:18 09.04.2009, you wrote:
This is curious - someone else mentioned to me
the other day that they had read in Janet
Arnold's "new" book, POF4 that the ruffs were
never stitched to hold the folds in shape. (She
cited the back part of the book where starching and shaping was described.)
I reread that section and could see that the
ruff they were working with, indeed was not
sewn with stitches, but I didn't see anything that said they were never sewn.
Are you citing something you have read?
Sg
> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:39:41 +0200
> To: [email protected]
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: [h-cost] Stitching on ruffs
>
> Hello,
>
> has anyone ever seen a ruff that really had the stitching along the
> outer edge to keep the "8"s in shape? "Period Costume for Stage and
> Screen" even suggests embellishing the ruff with beads on top of
> these stitches, but I feel they are just a theatrical neccessity as
> the ruffs are not properly starched and must keep their shapes in
> nylon material.
> Or is there evidence that these stitches would have been used as a
> decorative feature as well and that they are documentable?
>
> Thank you,
> Hanna
>
> _______________________________________________
> h-costume mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
