On Aug 13, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Sharon Collier wrote:

Our group portrays Elizabeth's court around 1575. Our costumer is VERY
particular and she approves these. [Soles Thru Time]

I guess I'm more particular than your costumer! I don't care for these. First, they use the worst possible sources (Norris and Peacock vie for the bottom of my list). For example, this sweet ankle strap shoe: http://www.solesthrutime.com/Images/Slippers/ Greenandyellowwithanklestrap.jpg

Now, I'm not a shoe expert, but I have serious doubts that anyone was wearing a buckled ankle-strap slipper like this in the middle ages. I would, however, love to see evidence of it if anyone has some! Both Norris and Peacock drew some version of it, which makes me wonder where they got it, though I'm cynical enough to think (based on my experience with these sources) that Norris made it up and Peacock borrowed and improved it.

Next, their interpretation of these sources looks modern and costumey to me. Take for example these:
http://www.solesthrutime.com/Images/Slippers/TeardropSlashes.jpg

They have a strange side-lacing that I've never seen in a 16th- century shoe, and instead of a straight slash, they have teardrop- shaped openings.

These are probably the best ones:
http://www.solesthrutime.com/Images/Slippers/Unfinishedgreenslippers.jpg

though the one on the left has strange puffed leather in the slashes and the other has the pickadils way too far apart.

For the money they're charging, I'd rather go with something that looks a little more accurate. Try the plain shoe at Revival:

http://revival.us/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=310

It's not as fancy, but it's a much better shape and costs $100 less, too.

Melanie Schuessler
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to