Yes-- art for a stand, not for a head :) I actually liked the blue outfit, but it wasn't as flattering to the girl as the pink (excuse me, taupe) was to her sister. I agree, though, she did look washed out despite the elegant style of the outfit.

    == Marjorie


On Apr 29, 2011, at 5:32 PM, Lynn Downward wrote:

Did you notice that the blue dress had a square neckline and shoulder rolls - mighthave made QEI proud. Yes it might have looked better in a smaller print or a solid color or even a stronger color; it seemed a bad copy of a
Pizarro or Monet.

I really liked the pink dress's yoke, spagetti straps woven from collar to shoulder point, very 1940s. I didn't like her hat - for a hat - but I liked it as a piece of art to sit on a stand. Maybe if it hadn't been raked so severely it might have looked better. I think that the UK has been under the
thumb of Phillip Treacy for far too long. It was he who designed the
sisters' hats and Camilla's hat plus several of the others at the wedding.
LynnD

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Sharon Collier <[email protected]>wrote:

The sisters should have switched colors. Blonde Beatrice wouldn't have looked so washed out and brunette Eugenie wouldn't have looked like she was
competing with her dress.
Their hat fairie should be fired.
Sharon C.

_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to