Julie wrote:

> Thanks for the responses. I knew the slashings could be done so they
>wouldn't fray. I guess the part I was really surprised by was saying that
>they slashed the clothing that was too small so it could be worn. I don' t
>know if that's just an origin story or what, but the Landsknect clothing
>I've seen was beautifully slashed in decorative ways and not in ways to
>make it larger.

Surely, to get into garments that are too small you would need to cut the
armholes, waistband etc, not just stretch the body of the fabric? I'd vote
for the "conspicuous consumption" theory.

BTW, the spelling is KNECHT (related to the English word "knight" which
originally meant a manservant, then a military follower).

Kate Bunting
Retired librarian & 17th century reenactor
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to