This is not a very good solution for us. On our embedded platform
recreating that index can take 5-6 minutes.
I don't see how this can be a safety "feature" keeping 24 MB of
trailing zeroes in the index file for 1 MB of data :)

On Dec 19, 3:17 am, trashgod <[email protected]> wrote:
> It may not be so much a bug as a safety feature. I see that deleting
> the index.db file causes indexes to be rebuilt when the database is
> next opened. Why not make that part of your recovery process?
>
> On Dec 18, 11:24 am, Alex <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > The index does get much small when recreated.
>
> > I think this is some kind of a bug in the recovery code.
>
> > Under the normal operation the index file size in our database is
> > about 60% of the data size.
> > However after several power failures it grows to some very
> > unreasonable size (in some cases it is 25 times the data size).
> > We are implementing a work-around that would delete the index file if
> > the size is unreasonable, but I'd much rather have the recovery /
> > store code fixes.
>
> > Alex
>
> > On Dec 17, 10:12 pm, trashgod <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 16, 5:12 pm, Alex <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I have a fairly small database one table has 1400 rows and the other
> > > > table is about 3500 rows. I have 3 primary key indexes and 5 indexes
> > > > on BIGINT column types.
>
> > > > The data file size is about 1 MB, however the index size grows to
> > > > about 25+ MB. I don't have the entire diagnostic information yet, but
> > > > I think that it has to do with the power failures and the recovery of
> > > > the index after the failure.
>
> > > > The problem is that the larger this index file is the longer it takes
> > > > to recover from the failure next time around. I also looked at the
> > > > index file with the HEX viewer. It appears that beyond the first
> > > > 5%-8% of the file the rest is filled with zeroes.
>
> > > > What is the expected data / index size ratio in H2? Is there anything
> > > > short of recreating the index to get it compacted? What can be
> > > > causing most of the index file to have zeroes in it?
>
> > > Why not drop and recreate the constraints & indexes? See if it gets
> > > smaller.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 
Database" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to