Thanks for reply, Thomas.
It seems temp tables performs not faster than regular tables (not much
at least). In-memory db is much more faster. But I need to mix
persistent data with runtime data in one db, fully in-memory database
is not suited for such case. And anyways temporary tables and indexes
for them need to be recreated each time that is not very cool thing...
Thats why I've asked for real in-memory tables and indexes - I'm
simply for performance, flexibility and usability in any case. How do
you think is it very hard to implement? May be I'll prepare patch
myself?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2
Database" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
