> Should the JdbcConnectionPool be used for server-less multi-connection > mode?
Hm. I think I made the assumption that by "server-less, multi-connection mode" you meant "named in-memory", however, reading the thread about the first-connection being in-memory, and also starting up a server, I'm thinking they maybe be different things. In my JdbcConnectionPool vs. FakeDataSource post, I meant "named in-memory", e.g. no server/tcp connections, just all to mem:foo. Apologies for the assumption. Thanks, Stephen --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
