Hi, > I find these two statements in changelog conflicting
You are right. I changed it now: "Disabling the page store is no longer supported. The old storage mechanism has been removed, shrinking the jar file size by almost 10%.". > Also, why all the properties have been disabled could have a mention to why? Most of then were there fore a long time, but always with the same value. There was no unit test with the other value. So changing them was potentially dangerous (not a lot, but still). I wanted to get rid of the older code. > Any why the WEAK_ and TQ cache types have been removed? A weak reference cache never frees up memory so it's the same as having a very large cache size. The TQ cache was not included in the jar file since a longer time, and was not tested. > And why the LOG setting has no effect? This only had an effect when the page store was disabled. > There was a bit more than normal of such statements about removing stuff > without any mention as of to why - which I didn't find a positive! I'm sorry about that. I know, those may be breaking changes for some applications. However I wanted to get rid of old, untested and unmaintained code. I did create a branch however. So it's still possible to backport bugfixes for those who don't want to use the page store file format. Regards, Thomas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.
