Hi,

> I suggested that the message writes to stderr and/or stdout. I know that's
> pretty poor, and often useless, but I can't think of a better option, and it
> *might* point some users in the right direction.

I would like to avoid that. I think it's bad style if a library writes
to stderr / stdout.

> there do seem to be many issues
> raised on this list that are resolved by getting the version of the client
> and the engine aligned.
>
> Do you think this is just a short-term problem?

I hope so, yes. The main problem was that this use case was not
tested. Having automated tests should catch problems in the future.

Regards,
Thomas

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 
Database" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.

Reply via email to