According to the documentation hash indexes are kept in memory. My assumption would have been that this being the case they wouldn't much of a representation in the file at all --- just declarations of what they are called and what they index --- and that when the DB is created from a file all the entries would be scanned to create the in- memory hash map. However, creating a non-hash index and creating a hash index both seam increase the size of the db files by almost exactly the same amount. I was just wondering why this is so.
Thanks, Paul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.
