I think I will leave it out for now. I can have an underling come back and add it as a compile-time option without much hassle.
On Apr 21, 2010, at 12:23 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote: > Hi, > >> Is there some legitimate reason that I'm not aware of why one would must >> have a single connection shared over multiple threads? > > As long as you use the connection only in one thread at a time it's > not a problem. Having the JDBC methods synchronized is just a safety > net, a added protection. For client/server databases this may not be > required, but for embedded databases it's quite important otherwise > you might get a database corruption because of that. > > Regards, > Thomas > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 > Database" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.
