thanks for the info.

one more follow-up:

How concurrency-friendly is each option?  suppose you have many threads adding 
records and many threads reading records to process incoming data. is either of 
the two options going to be inherently better under that sort of load?

-James

On Apr 29, 2010, at 11:23 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I should add: memFS and memLZF are mainly used for testing the
> database engine itself (H2 unit tests). So:
> 
> jdbc:h2:mem:x (fastest, uses the most memory)
> jdbc:h2:memFS:x (slower, uses a bit less memory)
> jdbc:h2:memLZF:x (slowest, uses less memory)
> 
> Regards,
> Thomas
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 
> Database" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 
Database" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.

Reply via email to