On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:49, Soupdragon <[email protected]> wrote: > In any case 1.2.135 is much too recent for me to be confident that > it's really stable. I'd prefer other people to find the bugs, to be > honest about it. My confidence in H2 regression testing has been > somewhat shaken of late.
ASFAIK there is no stable and testing separation or somehow different trunks. So just because 135 is very recent does not mean it has a high potential of bugs. The contrary seems to be true as I read a lot of bugs fixed during the last new versions. On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 14:36, Soupdragon <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, believe me you can pay a fortune for software and still be tripped > up by bugs in new releases, still have to give a lot of thought to the > perils of updating. Yes, indeed. For H2 what I noticed, bugs are fixed quite fast. Of course - the community has to help. I am sure that the developers try to cover every use case but of course they can't think of everything. Regarding the Open Source and bugs and testing, you might want to listen to this: http://techcast.chariotsolutions.com/index.php?post_id=458384 -- Martin Wildam -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.
