> In your diagram there is only one link between both server. This one > link is a single point of failure. So your configuration is > "invalid" as far as high availability is concerned.
Indeed - you are correct. However, this is not the question. It would be easily possible to construct a valid (single-)failure-tolerant network and still there is a chance of network failure (e.g. multiple component failures). Sure ... nobody would expect that in such a situation the databases stay in sync. BUT: my customers would expect that after the network has been put up in operation again, the databases would at least notice that they are out of sync. Thanks, Stephan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.
