I think Thomas' answer should be interpreted as: works reasonably, not high on the priority list. So make a patch with test cases and it will be fixed. I give +1 for consistent behavior but the only problem with the fix is that it is not backward compatible. On Dec 11, 2011 12:15 AM, "Paigan Jadoth" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Oh, I didn't notice you answered on this back then. > > Hm. > While I respect your answer, I can't see where it is reasonable to > bend the DB's standard meaning of "default schema" to "currently being > created object's schema". Especially when providing no argument at all > in the response ^^. > Nevertheless, thanks for the answer. I already resigned to the fact > that H2 can't be safely used with the implicit default schema and > changed my code accordingly. > > > On Nov 2, 8:06 pm, Thomas Mueller <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think H2 behaves in a reasonable way in this regard, and I don't > > plan to change the behavior, sorry. > > > > I will reconsider this position if there are compatibility problems > > with other databases. > > > > Regards, > > Thomas > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "H2 Database" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.
