I was assuming the sql string would be parsed and converted to java function calls to the db. It would be faster if we can by pass the parsing part.
On Feb 17, 11:56 am, cowwoc <[email protected]> wrote: > Just curious: what kind of overhead is associated with SQL parsing? > > Thanks, > Gili > > On 17/02/2012 11:51 AM, Noel Grandin wrote: > > > > > > > > > that wouldn't gain you very much because the dominating factor is disk IO > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 17:08, java dev<[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello > > >> Since H2 is written in java I was wondering if there is a faster way > >> to perform inserts with direct java function calls instead of writing > >> the "INSERT INTO..." and parsing the string? > > >> Thanks > > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >> "H2 Database" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> [email protected]. > >> For more options, visit this group > >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.
