Hmm, I ran the measurements myself, and I'm seeing an improvement, but
it's on the order of 0.1%
What might be more interesting is to see how much of a difference it
makes to your own application, since your tests indicated that it was
showing up on the performance profile.
On 2012-04-26 13:22, Noel Grandin wrote:
Cool, thanks for your work.
Can you take measurements, then apply this patch to the test code, and
report on the difference?
On 2012-04-26 13:05, Carl Hasselskog wrote:
I've now created a patch for this (see attachment). Feel free to use
it under whatever license suits you.
When running then benchmark the difference was negligible. However,
after reading the benchmark code I couldn't find any part of that
actually would benefit from this patch (since all read are by
column-index not by name). Perhaps that it something that could be
added (e.g. by making queryReadResult read by column-name)? My guess
would be that getting by column-name would be more common so that
could potentially make the tests more similar to a real-world scenario.
Regards
Carl
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2
Database" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.
