In my web app with H2 it feels to be about twice as fast for me in
embedded. But it really depends on the number of queries. I was a bit
quick and dirty so have lots of small queries instead of doing it in a
big batch.
On 5/06/2012 3:31 AM, toolforger wrote:
Ah, sweet.
Sounds like H2 is good to go for the upcoming project then.
Anybody got a rough rule-of-thumb figure what's the performance
difference between running H2 embedded and running H2 over localhost?
I already know it's massively dependent on the amount of work each SQL
statement does, so I'd be happy with any order-of-magnitude figure :-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "H2 Database" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/h2-database/-/Ay-eDQKsWUUJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2
Database" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.
