That does sound a bit drastic!. Would be good if the JIT compiler made
everything 41 times faster :).
I'm really not sure sorry. I think if you can post a reproducible test
case then someone will work it out!
Perhaps it might be that the OS is swapping your data to disk, and on
repeated querying it swaps it back and keeps it in memory so is faster.
What I mean is, if you can post some more details then that should help
us work it out.
Thanks, Ryan
On 3/10/2012 8:02 PM, snookerms wrote:
Am Dienstag, 2. Oktober 2012 14:36:17 UTC+2 schrieb Kartweel:
Maybe this is due to the JIT compiler optimising it?
On 2/10/2012 6:31 PM, snookerms wrote:
> I'm running a SQL-Query the first time it takes 1540ms. The Second
> time it take 749ms and the third time 503ms and so on.
Thank You. But a Difference of 41 times faster?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "H2 Database" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/h2-database/-/YP3SrTKKfvIJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2
Database" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.
