No, but in general, we're not likely to spend any effort checking precisely because that version is so ancient.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:35 PM, witerat <[email protected]> wrote: > Yep, it's ancient, alright. However that doesn't necessarily have any > bearing on the question of whether the issues remain in the code base for > more current versions. > :) > > > On Monday, November 26, 2012 8:40:56 PM UTC+13, Noel Grandin wrote: >> >> Thanks, but that's a truly ancient version of H2. >> >> On 2012-11-24 03:24, witerat wrote: >> > The script was generated by h2 version 1.1.111, if these issues >> > haven't addressed yet, I think would be worth considering. >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "H2 Database" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/h2-database/-/DEQD7KcMlr4J. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.
