Thanks for the reply. Most of the time I only use put and get, I think these methods will be stable and I don't need to change my code very often.
I will try it. Am Mittwoch, 8. Mai 2013 22:08:30 UTC+2 schrieb Thomas Mueller: > > Hi, > > I don't expect any big changes, but I still consider it experimental, > because the API might change, and because it is not fully tested (specially > multi-threading). But depending on your use case it might already be "good > enough", specially if you have your own test cases to ensure the features > you use are working as expected. > > Regards, > Thomas > > > > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Thorsten Marx <[email protected]<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm looking for a java embedded key-value store with support for >> versioning. >> I've found the MVStore implementation and it seems to be exactly what I'm >> looking for. >> My question is, is it usable for production in the current version? >> >> Kind regards >> Thorsten >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "H2 Database" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:> >> . >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
