Hi, Yes, if it's a problem, you could lock one table at a time (using "select ... for update").
Regards, Thomas On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Gili <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to get your opinion regarding > http://stackoverflow.com/a/112256/14731 > > Is it fair to say that database deadlocks are not preventable: > > 1. Using portable SQL, since the SQL standard does not specify lock > ordering; > 2. Using database-specific SQL code, because the execution plan of a > database might change over time. > > Thank you, > Gili > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "H2 Database" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
