Hi, Sure, the spatial index can be switched to double. Maybe it makes sense to support both, as float uses less space, and maybe it makes sense to be backward compatible. What do other think about this?
About not relying on the JTS suite, I'm think we would need your help, for example in the form of a patch. Regards, Thomas On Sunday, July 26, 2015, Michaël Michaud <[email protected]> wrote: > >> - The R-Tree spatial index uses float instead of double. This is simply >> not realistic for GIS where we need to represent and index centimeter-sized >> features extending on possibly thousands of kilometers. 64-bit FP's are an >> absolute requirement could this be changed in H2 ? >> >> I also noticed that a few months ago and would like to support Gordan's > request as using floats in the rtree and double in data coordinates can > probably lead to unexpected results. > > Michaël > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "H2 Database" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','h2-database%[email protected]');> > . > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
