I added basic support for TIMESTAMP WITH TIMEZONE recently, but I haven't looked at what JDBC 4.2 needs On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 at 16:22, Hubert Ströbitzer <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have the same question. For our product JSR-310 support is mandatory - > so if no support from H2 we will have to switch (unfortunatelly) to HSQLDB > again. At least a time frame when this feature is to be expected would be > nice to have. > > > Am Donnerstag, 13. August 2015 15:02:08 UTC+2 schrieb Lukas Eder: >> >> Hello, >> >> Just a quick question: JDBC 4.2 / Java 8 added "support" for JSR-310 in >> the API, meaning that drivers can now official bind >> >> *Existing in H2:* >> >> - LocalDate to SQL DATE >> - LocalTime to SQL TIME >> - LocalDateTime to SQL TIMESTAMP >> >> *New in H2:* >> >> - OffsetTime to SQL TIME WITH ZONE >> - OffsetDateTime to SQL TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE >> >> I currently don't see such an increment on the roadmap: >> http://www.h2database.com/html/roadmap.html >> >> And I haven't found any discussions on the mailing list. Is that >> something worth considering in the near future? Is there any JDBC 4.2 >> upgrade strategy, yet? >> >> Cheers, >> Lukas >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "H2 Database" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/h2-database. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/h2-database. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
