Hi, OK I see. I'm not sure, maybe this is a bug? Can you reproduce it with a simple test case (for example using <Integer, String>)?
Regards, Thomas On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Roland Lohner <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > I suspect you misunderstood case B). > In that case only the search function is called. > It means there is no overwrite as there are no put operations, only get > operations are called. > > I am wondering what causes the different used cache size in case B) > > Regarding 1.7G java memory vs. 5G reported cache size anomaly. You are > right. > I have put a special structure as value into MVMap, without using a proper > DataType as valueType. > So MVMap did not have a chance to estimate used cache size. > > Regards, Roland > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "H2 Database" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/h2-database. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/h2-database. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
