Hi, OK I see. I'm not sure, maybe this is a bug? Can you reproduce it with a simple test case (for example using <Integer, String>)?
Regards, Thomas On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Roland Lohner <loc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > I suspect you misunderstood case B). > In that case only the search function is called. > It means there is no overwrite as there are no put operations, only get > operations are called. > > I am wondering what causes the different used cache size in case B) > > Regarding 1.7G java memory vs. 5G reported cache size anomaly. You are > right. > I have put a special structure as value into MVMap, without using a proper > DataType as valueType. > So MVMap did not have a chance to estimate used cache size. > > Regards, Roland > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "H2 Database" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to h2-database+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to h2-database@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/h2-database. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to h2-database+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to h2-database@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/h2-database. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
