Hi, I would try using one store, with a higher cache size. The cache is shared, so in theory performance should be a bit better (slightly higher cache usage).
Regards, Thomas On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Kenton Garner <[email protected]> wrote: > First - Thomas and Noel, Thanks for everything. > I think you have a great project here and I am just learning to love the > MVStore all by itself. > > So the question is... > > Assuming I have: > MVMap<String, String> cacheA; > MVMap<String, byte[]> cacheB; > > If I want to store a lot of short lived key/value pairs within these two > MVMap objects in a persisted MVStore instance; > Would it be best to use one instance of MVStore to hold both MVMap objects > or should I assign each MVMap to its own MVStore and persisted file? > > This is of course a performance and disk space question. > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "H2 Database" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/h2-database. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/h2-database. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
