as I understand it, this is copying and pasting a frequent part of the storage file into another smaller storage file.
but I was wondering if it would be faster to insert data directly into the directory system instead of storage files. on the internet there are several theories, but none shows a benchmark, and I think that 1 creator of 1 database may have tested adversarial databases to analyze performance. they say sqlite is 70% faster than the file system, but I can’t understand why, I still don’t have the means to test whether it’s true and I don’t even find test videos like they do on video cards even for ram, processor, ghz, core due to fps Em domingo, 12 de abril de 2020 03:50:52 UTC-3, Noel Grandin escreveu: > > Not really, look up how an LRU cache works e.g. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cache_replacement_policies > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to h2-database+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/h2-database/160a8a36-1879-4823-8e06-3be0060846cf%40googlegroups.com.
