as I understand it, this is copying and pasting a frequent part of the storage file into another smaller storage file.
but I was wondering if it would be faster to insert data directly into the directory system instead of storage files. on the internet there are several theories, but none shows a benchmark, and I think that 1 creator of 1 database may have tested adversarial databases to analyze performance. they say sqlite is 70% faster than the file system, but I can’t understand why, I still don’t have the means to test whether it’s true and I don’t even find test videos like they do on video cards even for ram, processor, ghz, core due to fps Em domingo, 12 de abril de 2020 03:50:52 UTC-3, Noel Grandin escreveu: > > Not really, look up how an LRU cache works e.g. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cache_replacement_policies > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/h2-database/160a8a36-1879-4823-8e06-3be0060846cf%40googlegroups.com.
