OHAC is also broken by changes that went into snv_107. We will release a 
new source drop after we have fixes for both those builds.

Thanks
Jonathan

Venkateswarlu Tella wrote:
> Hi Liuyong,
> OHAC is not yet supported on snv_106. The current supported version is 
> only 101a.
> The support for snv_106 might be available in next OHAC release.
> 
> Thanks
> -Venku
> 
> On 02/19/09 14:35, liuyong wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I want to build Open HA Cluster core on "Solaris Express Community 
>> Edition snv_106 X86".
>> I followed this guide:
>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/ha-clusters/ohac/Documentation/Core/buildingcore/
>>  
>>
>>
>> but I got some errors:
>> /opt/SUNWspro//bin/CC   -g0 -xO3    /usr/src/uts/intel/ia32/ml/ia32.il 
>> -xspace -temp=/tmp/nbuild-root-tmp.29204
>> /tmp -Qoption ccfe -messages=no%anachronism -Qoption ccfe 
>> -features=no%conststrings -xwe -xildoff +p +w -featur
>> es=no%except  -instances=extern -library=no%Crun -library=no%Cstd 
>> -D_KERNEL -D_SYSCALL32  -DSYSACCT -DC2_AUDIT   -I../../../intel 
>> -I../../../sparc -I../../../linux  
>> -I/export/home/yongl/OHAC/ohac+5.11+i386/proto/Sol_11-nd/
>> root_i386/usr/include    -I/usr/include -DVXFS_DISABLED 
>> -DSOL_VERSION=200710 -I/export/home/yongl/OHAC/ohac+5.1
>> 1+i386/usr/src/common/cl 
>> -I/export/home/yongl/OHAC/ohac+5.11+i386/usr/src/common/cl/interfaces/32 
>> -D_KERNEL_ORB
>>   -DDBGBUFS -c -o obj32/ipconf.o 
>> /export/home/yongl/OHAC/ohac+5.11+i386/usr/src/common/cl/orb/ip/ipconf.cc
>> "/export/home/yongl/OHAC/ohac+5.11+i386/usr/src/common/cl/orb/ip/ipconf.cc", 
>> line 128: Error: Too many arguments in call to "solookup(int, int, 
>> int, sockparams**)".
>> "/export/home/yongl/OHAC/ohac+5.11+i386/usr/src/common/cl/orb/ip/ipconf.cc", 
>> line 128: Error: Cannot assign int to vnode*.
>> "/export/home/yongl/OHAC/ohac+5.11+i386/usr/src/common/cl/orb/ip/ipconf.cc", 
>> line 129: Error: Formal argument 1 of type sockparams* in call to 
>> socreate(sockparams*, int, int, int, int, int*) is being passed vnode*.
>> "/export/home/yongl/OHAC/ohac+5.11+i386/usr/src/common/cl/orb/ip/ipconf.cc", 
>> line 130: Error: Too many arguments in call to "socreate(sockparams*, 
>> int, int, int, int, int*)".
>> "/export/home/yongl/OHAC/ohac+5.11+i386/usr/src/common/cl/orb/ip/ipconf.cc", 
>> line 186: Error: Too many arguments in call to "solookup(int, int, 
>> int, sockparams**)".
>> "/export/home/yongl/OHAC/ohac+5.11+i386/usr/src/common/cl/orb/ip/ipconf.cc", 
>> line 186: Error: Cannot assign int to vnode*.
>> "/export/home/yongl/OHAC/ohac+5.11+i386/usr/src/common/cl/orb/ip/ipconf.cc", 
>> line 205: Error: Formal argument 1 of type sockparams* in call to 
>> socreate(sockparams*, int, int, int, int, int*) is being passed vnode*.
>> "/export/home/yongl/OHAC/ohac+5.11+i386/usr/src/common/cl/orb/ip/ipconf.cc", 
>> line 206: Error: Too many arguments in call to "socreate(sockparams*, 
>> int, int, int, int, int*)".
>> "/export/home/yongl/OHAC/ohac+5.11+i386/usr/src/common/cl/orb/ip/ipconf.cc", 
>> line 206: Error: Cannot use int to initialize sonode*.
>> 9 Error(s) detected.
>> *** Error code 9
>> dmake: Fatal error: Command failed for target `obj32/ipconf.o'
>> Current working directory 
>> /export/home/yongl/OHAC/ohac+5.11+i386/usr/src/uts/intel/cl/cl_comm
>> Waiting for 2 jobs to finish
>> *** Error code 1
>> The following command caused the error:
>> BUILD_TYPE=OBJ32 dmake install.targ
>> dmake: Fatal error: Command failed for target `install.obj32'
>> Current working directory 
>> /export/home/yongl/OHAC/ohac+5.11+i386/usr/src/uts/intel/cl/cl_comm
>> *** Error code 1
>> The following command caused the error:
>> cd cl_comm; pwd; dmake install
>> dmake: Fatal error: Command failed for target `cl_comm'
>> Current working directory 
>> /export/home/yongl/OHAC/ohac+5.11+i386/usr/src/uts/intel/cl
>>
>> It seem that the version of libc is wrong. How can I fix it.
>>
>> Thanks yong
> _______________________________________________
> ha-clusters-discuss mailing list
> ha-clusters-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-clusters-discuss

Reply via email to