Nicholas Solter wrote:
> Lucia,
>
> This looks good to me, though I can't really comment on the 
> dependencies. I'll trust your research on that ;-) Here are a few 
> comments:
>
> usr/src/cmd/ha-services/derby/derby_lib.ksh
>
> Do you still need the PKGINFO variable?
Yeah we still need it, since it is used by non-opensolaris release to do 
package checking, and is refered in "is_executable ${PKGINFO}".

>
> usr/src/ipsdefs/Makefile
>
> Since you're touching this file, you could update the ToDo list, as 
> we've done a lot of the stuff on the list.
Will do.
>
> usr/src/ipsdefs/SUNWsc/depend_static
>
> You removed the dependency on SUNWcs. But doesn't this package depend 
> on the kernel modules that are in SUNWcs?
SUNWcs is already in depend_auto, so I removed it from depend_static.

>
> General:
>
> I wonder if we should merge the depend_static and depend_auto files 
> for each package.
I think at some point Thorsten mentioned to keep both depend_auto and 
depend_static. We can talk about this when Thorsten is back.

Thanks Nick,

- Lucia


>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
> Yue Lai wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review the code review at
>>
>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~llai/bugs_dependfiles/
>>
>> It contains:
>>
>> - Refinement to the depend_static file of some packages, mostly in 
>> the SMG area. The changes are made by the study in the attached 
>> spread sheet which I followed Thorsten's model.
>>
>> - Fix to the following bugs:
>>
>> 6805653 scsetup is broken in colorado
>> 6805073 cacao doesn't start following cluster configuration reboot
>> 6803795 Some deliverables are in multiple IPS packages
>> 6803307 Cannot configure Ganymede on opensolaris
>> 6797472 The show subcommand of clsnmpuser and clsnmpmib contains 
>> error messages
>> Thanks,
>>
>> - Lucia
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ha-clusters-discuss mailing list
>> ha-clusters-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-clusters-discuss
>


Reply via email to